Re: [Patch v6 02/12] [media] s5p-mfc: Adding initial support for MFC v10.10

[Philippe Ombredanne]

Smitha,

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Smitha T Murthy <smitha.t@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Adding the support for MFC v10.10, with new register file and
> necessary hw control, decoder, encoder and structural changes.
>
> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Smitha T Murthy <smitha.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
[]
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/regs-mfc-v10.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +/*
> + * Register definition file for Samsung MFC V10.x Interface (FIMV) driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2017 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + *     http://www.samsung.com/
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */

Have you considered using the new SPDX ids instead of this fine legalese? e.g.:

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

This is much shorter and neater (unless you are a legalese lover of
course!)  Check also Thomas doc patches and Linus comments on why he
prefers the C++ comment style for these.

And even better could be this more compact form? I am a big fan of the
C++ style comments for these (and so is Linus)

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
// Copyright (c) 2017 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
// Register definition file for Samsung MFC V10.x Interface (FIMV) driver

You can also read this fine article from a fellow Samsung colleague
[1]. And if you ever consider doing this for all Samsung's past,
present and future contributions, you will have my deep gratitude

[1] https://blogs.s-osg.org/linux-kernel-license-practices-revisited-spdx/

-- 
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne, your licensing helper elf