On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 02:40:10PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
On 06/12/2017 13:37, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 12:13:16AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
SNIP
---
tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c | 215 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 198 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c b/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
index a0d489e..a820ed4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
+++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
#include <dirent.h>
#include <sys/time.h> /* getrlimit */
#include <sys/resource.h> /* getrlimit */
+#include <sys/queue.h>
#include <ftw.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include "jsmn.h"
@@ -366,6 +367,94 @@ static int print_events_table_entry(void *data, char *name, char *event,
return 0;
}
+struct event_struct {
+ char *name;
+ char *event;
+ char *desc;
+ char *long_desc;
+ char *pmu;
+ char *unit;
+ char *perpkg;
+ char *metric_expr;
+ char *metric_name;
+ char *metric_group;
+ LIST_ENTRY(event_struct) list;
is there any reason you don't use the 'struct list_head' ?
I dont think we want another thingie involved for lists
Hi jirka,
The linux kernel headers are not used for jevents tool. I would rather use
them if possible...
should be as easy as adding #include <linux/list.h> ;-)
it's heavily used within perf and I'm pretty sure we want
to keep around just one way of doing lists
thanks,
jirka
.