On Thursday 07 December 2017 10:44 PM, David Lechner wrote:
On 12/07/2017 08:52 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Saturday 02 December 2017 08:04 AM, David Lechner wrote:
This cleans up the map_io functions in the board init files for
mach-davinci.
Most of the boards had a wrapper function around <board>_init(). This
wrapper is removed and the function is used directly. Additionally, the
<board>_init() functions are renamed to <board>_map_io() to match the
field name.
Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c
b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c
index cb0a41e..f0e2762 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c
@@ -716,16 +716,6 @@ static void __init evm_init_i2c(void)
 }
 #endif
 -#define DM6467T_EVM_REF_FREQ 33000000
-
-static void __init davinci_map_io(void)
-{
-ÂÂÂ dm646x_init();
The call to dm646x_init() is dropped here, but I don't see it added
back, at least in this patch.
dm646x_init() is renamed to dm646x_map_io(), which is used directly in
MACHINE_START().
Ah, I missed that. But I think its a symptom of too many things going on
in the patch. How about splitting the patch to:
a) Remove trivial <board>_map_io() wrappers and use <soc>_init()
directly to initialize .map_io
b) Rename <soc>_init() to <soc>_map_io
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c
b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c
index da21353..b3be5c8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #include <linux/platform_data/edma.h>
 #include <linux/platform_data/gpio-davinci.h>
 +#include <asm/mach-types.h>
 #include <asm/mach/map.h>
  #include <mach/cputype.h>
@@ -952,11 +953,16 @@ int __init dm646x_init_edma(struct
edma_rsv_info *rsv)
ÂÂÂÂÂ return IS_ERR(edma_pdev) ? PTR_ERR(edma_pdev) : 0;
 }
 -void __init dm646x_init(void)
+#define DM6467T_EVM_REF_FREQÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ 33000000
+
+void __init dm646x_map_io(void)
 {
ÂÂÂÂÂ davinci_common_init(&davinci_soc_info_dm646x);
ÂÂÂÂÂ davinci_map_sysmod();
ÂÂÂÂÂ davinci_clk_init(davinci_soc_info_dm646x.cpu_clks);
+
+ÂÂÂ if (machine_is_davinci_dm6467tevm())
+ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ davinci_set_refclk_rate(DM6467T_EVM_REF_FREQ);
 }
I think we should leave the DM646x case out of this since there are
additional issues like introducing these EVM specific defines in a file
meant for SoC.
I agree with the sentiment. This quirk gets moved around several times
in this series just to keep things working for a git bisect even if it
is not the ideal place for it to be.
Currently, all boards use a common reference frequency from the common
SoC files instead of the board file. I have not done so in this version
of the series, but I could rework it so that this happens, which would
remove the need for this quirk altogether. But even then, it would
probably get shuffled around a bit before being eliminated.
We should avoid shuffling and modifying the same code repeatedly if we
can. I think, it will be easier to read if patch 2 and 1 are interchanged.
There is a lot going on and I wasn't sure how that will look so I tried
it briefly and pushed a branch.
Do have a look, but this seems better to me.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nsekhar/linux-davinci.git/log/?h=for-davidl