Re: [PATCH] docs: refcount_t documentation

[Jonathan Corbet]

On Tue,  5 Dec 2017 12:46:35 +0200
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Some functions from refcount_t API provide different
> memory ordering guarantees that their atomic counterparts.
> This adds a document outlining these differences (
> Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst) as well as
> some other minor improvements.

I've applied this, thanks, it looks good.

One thing I noticed, though, is that this landed in the core-api manual,
while the refcount_t documentation is in the driver-api manual.  The
cross-references work just fine and such, but this still doesn't seem quite
right.  Probably what should be done is to have all the refcount_t
material in core-api; I may do that if I get a moment.

Thanks,

jon