Re: [PATCH 0/2] mux: add overview and add to driver-api docs

[Jonathan Corbet]

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:29:41 +0100
Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Don't know if this is worth adding, but it might answer at least a few
> questions.
> 
> It looks ok when I view the htmldocs output, but I'm not all that certain
> this is good to go?

Almost, but I have one request: the new mux.rst file is rather
unenlightening for somebody who reads it directly in the docs tree.  If
you want to keep the bulk of the text in the source I can live with that,
but can mux.rst at least get an introductory paragraph saying what it
covers (what *is* the mux subsystem?) and why readers might want to go
find the rest?

Thanks,

jon