Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: Add software workaround for Falkor erratum 1041
From: Shanker Donthineni
Date: Mon Dec 11 2017 - 17:26:14 EST
Thanks Mark, I'll post v5 patch without alternatives.
On 12/11/2017 04:45 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 08:03:43PM -0600, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * Errata workaround prior to disable MMU. Insert an ISB immediately prior
>> + * to executing the MSR that will change SCTLR_ELn[M] from a value of 1 to 0.
>> + */
>> + .macro pre_disable_mmu_workaround
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_QCOM_FALKOR_ERRATUM_E1041
>> +alternative_if ARM64_WORKAROUND_QCOM_FALKOR_E1041
>> + isb
>> +alternative_else_nop_endif
>> +#endif
>> + .endm
>
> There's really no need for this to be an alternative. It makes the
> kernel larger and more complex due to all the altinstr data and probing
> code.
>
> As Will suggested last time [1], please just use the ifdef, and always
> compile-in the extra ISB if CONFIG_QCOM_FALKOR_ERRATUM_E1041 is
> selected. Get rid of the alternatives and probing code.
>
> All you need here is:
>
> /*
> * Some Falkor parts make errant speculative instruction fetches
> * when SCTLR_ELx.M is cleared. An ISB before the write to
> * SCTLR_ELx prevents this.
> */
> .macro pre_disable_mmu_workaround
> #ifdef
> isb
> #endif
> .endm
>
>> +
>> + .macro pre_disable_mmu_early_workaround
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_QCOM_FALKOR_ERRATUM_E1041
>> + isb
>> +#endif
>> + .endm
>> +
>
> ... and we don't need a special early variant.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171201112457.GE18083@xxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
Shanker Donthineni
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.