Re: [PATCH v7 24/37] tracing: Add support for 'synthetic' events
From: Namhyung Kim
Date: Tue Dec 12 2017 - 09:44:54 EST
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 04:38:05PM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> Synthetic events are user-defined events generated from hist trigger
> variables saved from one or more other events.
>
> To define a synthetic event, the user writes a simple specification
> consisting of the name of the new event along with one or more
> variables and their type(s), to the tracing/synthetic_events file.
>
> For instance, the following creates a new event named 'wakeup_latency'
> with 3 fields: lat, pid, and prio:
>
> # echo 'wakeup_latency u64 lat; pid_t pid; int prio' >> \
> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/synthetic_events
>
> Reading the tracing/synthetic_events file lists all the
> currently-defined synthetic events, in this case the event we defined
> above:
>
> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/synthetic_events
> wakeup_latency u64 lat; pid_t pid; int prio
>
> At this point, the synthetic event is ready to use, and a histogram
> can be defined using it:
>
> # echo 'hist:keys=pid,prio,lat.log2:sort=pid,lat' >> \
> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/synthetic/wakeup_latency/trigger
>
> The new event is created under the tracing/events/synthetic/ directory
> and looks and behaves just like any other event:
>
> # ls /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/synthetic/wakeup_latency
> enable filter format hist id trigger
>
> Although a histogram can be defined for it, nothing will happen until
> an action tracing that event via the trace_synth() function occurs.
> The trace_synth() function is very similar to all the other trace_*
> invocations spread throughout the kernel, except in this case the
> trace_ function and its corresponding tracepoint isn't statically
> generated but defined by the user at run-time.
>
> How this can be automatically hooked up via a hist trigger 'action' is
> discussed in a subsequent patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> [fix noderef.cocci warnings, sizeof pointer for kcalloc of event->fields]
> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
[SNIP]
> +static enum print_line_t print_synth_event(struct trace_iterator *iter,
> + int flags,
> + struct trace_event *event)
> +{
> + struct trace_array *tr = iter->tr;
> + struct trace_seq *s = &iter->seq;
> + struct synth_trace_event *entry;
> + struct synth_event *se;
> + unsigned int i, n_u64;
> + char print_fmt[32];
> + const char *fmt;
> +
> + entry = (struct synth_trace_event *)iter->ent;
> + se = container_of(event, struct synth_event, call.event);
> +
> + trace_seq_printf(s, "%s: ", se->name);
> +
> + for (i = 0, n_u64 = 0; i < se->n_fields; i++) {
> + if (trace_seq_has_overflowed(s))
> + goto end;
> +
> + fmt = synth_field_fmt(se->fields[i]->type);
> +
> + /* parameter types */
> + if (tr->trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_VERBOSE)
> + trace_seq_printf(s, "%s ", fmt);
> +
> + snprintf(print_fmt, sizeof(print_fmt), "%%s=%s%%s", fmt);
> +
> + /* parameter values */
> + if (se->fields[i]->is_string) {
> + trace_seq_printf(s, print_fmt, se->fields[i]->name,
> + (char *)(long)entry->fields[n_u64],
Hmm.. shouldn't it be (char *)&entry->fields[n_u64] ?
Thanks,
Namhyung
> + i == se->n_fields - 1 ? "" : " ");
> + n_u64 += STR_VAR_LEN_MAX / sizeof(u64);
> + } else {
> + trace_seq_printf(s, print_fmt, se->fields[i]->name,
> + entry->fields[n_u64],
> + i == se->n_fields - 1 ? "" : " ");
> + n_u64++;
> + }
> + }
> +end:
> + trace_seq_putc(s, '\n');
> +
> + return trace_handle_return(s);
> +}