Re: [PATCH 5/8] power: supply: axp20x_battery: add support for AXP813

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:35:43 +0100
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> On 10/12/2017 17:49, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Mon,  4 Dec 2017 15:12:51 +0100
> > Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >   
> >> The X-Powers AXP813 PMIC has got some slight differences from
> >> AXP20X/AXP22X PMICs:
> >>  - the maximum voltage supplied by the PMIC is 4.35 instead of 4.36/4.24
> >>  for AXP20X/AXP22X,
> >>  - the constant charge current formula is different,
> >>
> >> It also has a bit to tell whether the battery percentage returned by the
> >> PMIC is valid.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
> > 
> > I'd use switch statements when matching the IDs as that'll be more elegant
> > as you perhaps add further devices going forward...
> > 
> > Other than that, looks good to me.
> >   
> 
> Well, I was wondering if it shouldn't be better to define a structure
> for each device containing their quirks, functions, etc... like it is
> done for the ADC or the ACIN power supply driver part.
> 

Even better.

> struct axp20x_data {
> 	bool	has_valid_fg_reg;
> 	void 	constant_charge_current_to_raw(struct axp20x_batt_ps *axp, int *val);
> 	void 	raw_to_constant_charge_current(struct axp20x_batt_ps *axp, int *val);
> 	int 	get_max_voltage(struct axp20x_batt_ps *axp, int *val);
> 	[...]
> };
> 
> static const struct of_device_id axp20x_battery_ps_id[] = {
> 	{ .compatible = "x-powers,axp209-battery-power-supply", .data = (void
> *)&axp209_data, }, {}
> };
> 
> void probe()
> {
> 	[...]
> 	axp20x_batt->info = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> 	[...]
> }
> 
> Sebastian, any objection on doing this?
> 
> Thanks,
> Quentin
> 
> > Jonathan
> >   
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/power/supply/axp20x_battery.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/axp20x_battery.c b/drivers/power/supply/axp20x_battery.c
> >> index 7494f0f..cb30302 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/power/supply/axp20x_battery.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/axp20x_battery.c
> >> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@
> >>  #define AXP20X_CHRG_CTRL1_TGT_4_2V	(2 << 5)
> >>  #define AXP20X_CHRG_CTRL1_TGT_4_36V	(3 << 5)
> >>  
> >> +#define AXP813_CHRG_CTRL1_TGT_4_35V	(3 << 5)
> >> +
> >>  #define AXP22X_CHRG_CTRL1_TGT_4_22V	(1 << 5)
> >>  #define AXP22X_CHRG_CTRL1_TGT_4_24V	(3 << 5)
> >>  
> >> @@ -123,10 +125,41 @@ static int axp22x_battery_get_max_voltage(struct axp20x_batt_ps *axp20x_batt,
> >>  	return 0;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> +static int axp813_battery_get_max_voltage(struct axp20x_batt_ps *axp20x_batt,
> >> +					  int *val)
> >> +{
> >> +	int ret, reg;
> >> +
> >> +	ret = regmap_read(axp20x_batt->regmap, AXP20X_CHRG_CTRL1, &reg);
> >> +	if (ret)
> >> +		return ret;
> >> +
> >> +	switch (reg & AXP20X_CHRG_CTRL1_TGT_VOLT) {  
> > 
> > You could do a lookup based from a table instead which might
> > be ever so slightly more elegant..
> >   
> >> +	case AXP20X_CHRG_CTRL1_TGT_4_1V:
> >> +		*val = 4100000;
> >> +		break;
> >> +	case AXP20X_CHRG_CTRL1_TGT_4_15V:
> >> +		*val = 4150000;
> >> +		break;
> >> +	case AXP20X_CHRG_CTRL1_TGT_4_2V:
> >> +		*val = 4200000;
> >> +		break;
> >> +	case AXP813_CHRG_CTRL1_TGT_4_35V:
> >> +		*val = 4350000;
> >> +		break;
> >> +	default:
> >> +		return -EINVAL;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  static void raw_to_constant_charge_current(struct axp20x_batt_ps *axp, int *val)
> >>  {
> >>  	if (axp->axp_id == AXP209_ID)
> >>  		*val = *val * 100000 + 300000;
> >> +	else if (axp->axp_id == AXP813_ID)
> >> +		*val = *val * 200000 + 200000;
> >>  	else
> >>  		*val = *val * 150000 + 300000;  
> > 
> > Switch?
> >   
> >>  }
> >> @@ -135,6 +168,8 @@ static void constant_charge_current_to_raw(struct axp20x_batt_ps *axp, int *val)
> >>  {
> >>  	if (axp->axp_id == AXP209_ID)
> >>  		*val = (*val - 300000) / 100000;
> >> +	else if (axp->axp_id == AXP813_ID)
> >> +		*val = (*val - 200000) / 200000;
> >>  	else
> >>  		*val = (*val - 300000) / 150000;
> >>  }
> >> @@ -269,7 +304,8 @@ static int axp20x_battery_get_prop(struct power_supply *psy,
> >>  		if (ret)
> >>  			return ret;
> >>  
> >> -		if (axp20x_batt->axp_id == AXP221_ID &&
> >> +		if ((axp20x_batt->axp_id == AXP221_ID ||
> >> +		     axp20x_batt->axp_id == AXP813_ID) &&
> >>  		    !(reg & AXP22X_FG_VALID))
> >>  			return -EINVAL;
> >>  
> >> @@ -284,6 +320,9 @@ static int axp20x_battery_get_prop(struct power_supply *psy,
> >>  		if (axp20x_batt->axp_id == AXP209_ID)
> >>  			return axp20x_battery_get_max_voltage(axp20x_batt,
> >>  							      &val->intval);
> >> +		else if (axp20x_batt->axp_id == AXP813_ID)
> >> +			return axp813_battery_get_max_voltage(axp20x_batt,
> >> +							      &val->intval);
> >>  		return axp22x_battery_get_max_voltage(axp20x_batt,
> >>  						      &val->intval);  
> > 
> > Worth converting to a switch statement to make it more elegant for future
> > devices?
> >   
> >>  
> >> @@ -467,6 +506,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id axp20x_battery_ps_id[] = {
> >>  	}, {
> >>  		.compatible = "x-powers,axp221-battery-power-supply",
> >>  		.data = (void *)AXP221_ID,
> >> +	}, {
> >> +		.compatible = "x-powers,axp813-battery-power-supply",
> >> +		.data = (void *)AXP813_ID,
> >>  	}, { /* sentinel */ },
> >>  };
> >>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, axp20x_battery_ps_id);  
> >   
>