Re: Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in resume from ACPI S3

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, December 14, 2017 12:54:05 PM CET Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Now the graphics issue is a different story. That only happens on
> > hibernation after doing the snapshot. There all non boot cpus are onlined
> > again and after that the devices are 'thawed'. The following reenable of
> > interrupts fails because i915 is not in PCI_D0 state.
> > 
> > Suspend:
> > 
> >    irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu: Mask 125 pci_msi_mask_irq+0x0/0x10
> >    __pci_write_msi_msg: 0000:00:02.0 00000000fee0100c 0000412a
> >    __pci_write_msi_msg: Not written <- Device not in PCI_D0
> >    ....
> >    device_pm_callback_start: i915 0000:00:02.0, parent: pci0000:00, noirq bus [resume]
> >    pci_pm_resume_noirq <-dpm_run_callback
> >    pci_pm_resume_noirq <-dpm_run_callback
> >    pci_pm_default_resume_early <-pci_pm_resume_noirq
> >    pci_pm_default_resume_early <-pci_pm_resume_noirq
> >    __pci_write_msi_msg: 0000:00:02.0 00000000fee0100c 0000412a  <-- Set the new affinity
> >    device_pm_callback_end: i915 0000:00:02.0, err=0
> 
> So this works, because we power up the device during resume even if it
> had been suspended (via runtime PM) before the suspend started.
> 
> > Hibernate:
> > 
> >    irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu: Mask 125 pci_msi_mask_irq+0x0/0x10
> >    __pci_write_msi_msg: 0000:00:02.0 00000000fee0100c 0000412a
> >    __pci_write_msi_msg: Not written <- Device not in PCI_D0
> >    ....
> >    device_pm_callback_start: i915 0000:00:02.0, parent: pci0000:00, noirq bus [thaw]
> >    pci_pm_thaw_noirq <-dpm_run_callback
> >    __pci_write_msi_msg: 0000:00:02.0 00000000fee0100c 0000412a
> >    __pci_write_msi_msg: Not written  <--- Device is not in PCI_D0
> >    device_pm_callback_end: i915 0000:00:02.0, err=0
> 
> And here we try to leave the device alone which is OK for devices in D0,
> but not for suspended ones.
> 
> It looks like we need to power up them at the "thaw" time too or at least
> I don't see how to address that differently.

The question is whether the code which brings the device out of D0 should
write the message unconditionally. That would be sufficient I think.

Thanks,

	tglx