Re: 4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk (also 4.12 stable)

From: Stefan Haberland
Date: Mon Dec 18 2017 - 08:56:18 EST


On 07.12.2017 00:29, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 01:25:11PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
t > commit 11b2025c3326f7096ceb588c3117c7883850c068 -> bad
blk-mq: create a blk_mq_ctx for each possible CPU
does not boot on DASD and
commit 9c6ae239e01ae9a9f8657f05c55c4372e9fc8bcc -> good
genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs
does boot with DASD disks.

Also adding Stefan Haberland if he has an idea why this fails on DASD and adding Martin (for the
s390 irq handling code).
That is interesting as it really isn't related to interrupts at all,
it just ensures that possible CPUs are set in ->cpumask.

I guess we'd really want:

e005655c389e3d25bf3e43f71611ec12f3012de0
"blk-mq: only select online CPUs in blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu"

before this commit, but it seems like the whole stack didn't work for
your either.

I wonder if there is some weird thing about nr_cpu_ids in s390?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


I tried this on my system and the blk-mq-hotplug-fix branch does not boot for me as well.
The disks get up and running and I/O works fine. At least the partition detection and EXT4-fs mount works.

But at some point in time the disk do not get any requests.

I currently have no clue why.
I took a dump and had a look at the disk states and they are fine. No error in the logs or in our debug entrys. Just empty DASD devices waiting to be called for I/O requests.

Do you have anything I could have a look at?