[PATCH 4.4 079/115] platform/x86: sony-laptop: Fix error handling in sony_nc_setup_rfkill()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


[ Upstream commit f6c8a317ab208aee223776327c06f23342492d54 ]

Source code review for a specific software refactoring showed the need
for another correction because the error code "-1" was returned so far
if a call of the function "sony_call_snc_handle" failed here.
Thus assign the return value from these two function calls also to
the variable "err" and provide it in case of a failure.

Fixes: d6f15ed876b83a1a0eba1d0473eef58acc95444a ("sony-laptop: use soft rfkill status stored in hw")
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/31/463
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<CAHp75VcMkXCioCzmLE0+BTmkqc5RSOx9yPO0ectVHMrMvewgwg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c |   14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/sony-laptop.c
@@ -1655,17 +1655,19 @@ static int sony_nc_setup_rfkill(struct a
 	if (!rfk)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	if (sony_call_snc_handle(sony_rfkill_handle, 0x200, &result) < 0) {
+	err = sony_call_snc_handle(sony_rfkill_handle, 0x200, &result);
+	if (err < 0) {
 		rfkill_destroy(rfk);
-		return -1;
+		return err;
 	}
 	hwblock = !(result & 0x1);
 
-	if (sony_call_snc_handle(sony_rfkill_handle,
-				sony_rfkill_address[nc_type],
-				&result) < 0) {
+	err = sony_call_snc_handle(sony_rfkill_handle,
+				   sony_rfkill_address[nc_type],
+				   &result);
+	if (err < 0) {
 		rfkill_destroy(rfk);
-		return -1;
+		return err;
 	}
 	swblock = !(result & 0x2);