Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] acpi: thermal: initialize tz_enabled to 1
From: Enric Balletbo Serra
Date: Wed Dec 20 2017 - 06:28:13 EST
Hi Rui,
2017-07-04 3:43 GMT+02:00 Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 23:08 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Enric Balletbo i Serra
>> <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > From: Sameer Nanda <snanda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > In the acpi_thermal_add path, acpi_thermal_get_info gets called
>> > before
>> > acpi_thermal_register_thermal_zone. Since tz_enabled was getting
>> > set to
>> > 1 only in acpi_thermal_register_thermal_zone, acpi_thermal_get_info
>> > ended up disabling thermal polling.
>> >
>> > Moved setting of tz_enabled to 1 into acpi_thermal_add itself.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Sameer Nanda <snanda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > >
>> > ---
>> > Changes since v2:
>> > - Zhang Rui:
>> > - Make sure tz->tz_enabled is set properly before registering
>> > the zone.
>> >
>> > Changes since v1:
>> > - This patch is new from v1 [1]
>> >
>> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9804229/
>> >
>> > drivers/acpi/thermal.c | 3 +--
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
>> > index 1d0417b..cd0fe92 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
>> > @@ -930,8 +930,6 @@ static int
>> > acpi_thermal_register_thermal_zone(struct acpi_thermal *tz)
>> > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>> > return -ENODEV;
>> >
>> > - tz->tz_enabled = 1;
>> > -
>> > dev_info(&tz->device->dev, "registered as
>> > thermal_zone%d\n",
>> > tz->thermal_zone->id);
>> > return 0;
>> > @@ -1088,6 +1086,7 @@ static int acpi_thermal_add(struct
>> > acpi_device *device)
>> > return -ENOMEM;
>> >
>> > tz->device = device;
>> > + tz->tz_enabled = 1;
>> > strcpy(tz->name, device->pnp.bus_id);
>> > strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_THERMAL_DEVICE_NAME);
>> > strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_THERMAL_CLASS);
>> > --
>> Rui,
>>
>> Can I just apply this, or do I need to work for a thermal core
>> update?
>> In the latter case, can you take care of this one too, please?
>>
> Yes, I will take both of the patches.
>
Long time since I posted these patches but didn't land, I'm not sure
if you're waiting an action from me. Are fine ? Do you want me to
rebase it on top of mainline and resend?
Thanks,
Enric
> thanks,
> rui
>
>> Thanks,
>> Rafael