Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] memfd: add sealing to hugetlb-backed memory
From: Mike Kravetz
Date: Wed Dec 20 2017 - 19:40:29 EST
On 12/20/2017 04:26 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:10:51 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Wed 20-12-17 15:15:50, Marc-Andrà Lureau wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:13 AM, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> +Cc: Andrew, Michal, David
>>>>
>>>> Are there any other comments on this patch series from Marc-AndrÃ? Is anything
>>>> else needed to move forward?
>>>>
>>>> I have reviewed the patches in the series. David Herrmann (the original
>>>> memfd_create/file sealing author) has also taken a look at the patches.
>>>>
>>>> One outstanding issue is sorting out the config option dependencies. Although,
>>>> IMO this is not a strict requirement for this series. I have addressed this
>>>> issue in a follow on series:
>>>> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109014109.21077-1-mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> Are we good for the next merge window? Is Hugh Dickins the maintainer
>>> with the final word, and doing the pull request? (sorry, I am not very
>>> familiar with kernel development)
>>
>> Andrew will pick it up, I assume. I will try to get and review this but
>> there is way too much going on before holiday.
>
> Yup, things are quiet at present.
>
> I'll suck these up for a bit of testing - please let me know if you'd
> prefer them to be held back for a cycle (ie: for 4.17-rc1)
Thanks Andrew,
As mentioned above there is one issue related to this series that we may
want to address. It is described in the series at:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109014109.21077-1-mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx
I did not get many comments on this series/issue. If we want to do
something like this, now might be a good time.
--
Mike Kravetz