Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] phy: core: Drop unused runtime PM APIs

[Ulf Hansson]

On 21 December 2017 at 13:24, Yoshihiro Shimoda
<yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> From: Ulf Hansson, Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 7:58 PM
>>
>> On 21 December 2017 at 11:33, Yoshihiro Shimoda
>> <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hi Ulf-san,
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Ulf Hansson, Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 11:09 PM
>> > <snip>
>> >> diff --git a/include/linux/phy/phy.h b/include/linux/phy/phy.h
>> >> index b4298a1..050b620 100644
>> >> --- a/include/linux/phy/phy.h
>> >> +++ b/include/linux/phy/phy.h
>> >> @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
>> >>  #include <linux/err.h>
>> >>  #include <linux/of.h>
>> >>  #include <linux/device.h>
>> >> -#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>> >
>> > After I applied this patch, some ata and gpu drivers causes build error [1].
>> > So, we should fix the drivers at first...
>>
>> Huh, right, those drivers shouldn't be relying on the phy.h to include
>> pm_runtime.h.
>>
>> The easiest way at this point is to just put back "#include
>> <linux/pm_runtime.h>" in phy.h, then we can deal with these problems
>> separately. I do that in a re-spin soon.
>
> I got it.
>
>> BTW, I would be great if you could test this on the Renesas SoC to
>> make sure it still fixes the problems (at least half of them I mean).
>
> Sure. I put back the "#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>" in the phy.h and tested
> the patches on my environment (r8a7795-salvator-x.dts with v4.15-rc4). And then,
> the issue [1] disappeared.
> [1]:
> printed "Enabling runtime PM for inactive device (ee0a0200.usb-phy) with active children"
> in resume timing.
>
> So,
>
> Tested-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Great, thanks!

I add your tag in the next re-vision!

Kind regards
Uffe