Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: memcontrol: memory+swap accounting for cgroup-v2

[Shakeel Butt]

> The swap (and its performance) is and should be transparent
> to the job owners.

Please ignore this statement, I didn't mean to claim on the
independence of job performance and underlying swap performance, sorry
about that.

I meant to say that the amount of anon memory a job can allocate
should be independent to the underlying swap.