[PATCH 3.18 28/38] backlight: pwm_bl: Fix overflow condition

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


[ Upstream commit 5d0c49acebc9488e37db95f1d4a55644e545ffe7 ]

This fixes an overflow condition that can happen with high max
brightness and period values in compute_duty_cycle. This fixes it by
using a 64 bit variable for computing the duty cycle.

Signed-off-by: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c |    7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
@@ -78,14 +78,17 @@ static void pwm_backlight_power_off(stru
 static int compute_duty_cycle(struct pwm_bl_data *pb, int brightness)
 {
 	unsigned int lth = pb->lth_brightness;
-	int duty_cycle;
+	u64 duty_cycle;
 
 	if (pb->levels)
 		duty_cycle = pb->levels[brightness];
 	else
 		duty_cycle = brightness;
 
-	return (duty_cycle * (pb->period - lth) / pb->scale) + lth;
+	duty_cycle *= pb->period - lth;
+	do_div(duty_cycle, pb->scale);
+
+	return duty_cycle + lth;
 }
 
 static int pwm_backlight_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl)