Re: [PATCH v4 17/19] xfs: avoid setting XFS_ILOG_CORE if i_version doesn't need incrementing

From: Darrick J. Wong
Date: Fri Dec 22 2017 - 19:16:13 EST


On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 07:05:54AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> If XFS_ILOG_CORE is already set then go ahead and increment it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks ok,
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c
> index 225544327c4f..4a89da4b6fe7 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c
> @@ -112,15 +112,17 @@ xfs_trans_log_inode(
>
> /*
> * First time we log the inode in a transaction, bump the inode change
> - * counter if it is configured for this to occur. We don't use
> - * inode_inc_version() because there is no need for extra locking around
> - * i_version as we already hold the inode locked exclusively for
> - * metadata modification.
> + * counter if it is configured for this to occur. While we have the
> + * inode locked exclusively for metadata modification, we can usually
> + * avoid setting XFS_ILOG_CORE if no one has queried the value since
> + * the last time it was incremented. If we have XFS_ILOG_CORE already
> + * set however, then go ahead and bump the i_version counter
> + * unconditionally.
> */
> if (!(ip->i_itemp->ili_item.li_desc->lid_flags & XFS_LID_DIRTY) &&
> IS_I_VERSION(VFS_I(ip))) {
> - inode_inc_iversion(VFS_I(ip));
> - flags |= XFS_ILOG_CORE;
> + if (inode_maybe_inc_iversion(VFS_I(ip), flags & XFS_ILOG_CORE))
> + flags |= XFS_ILOG_CORE;
> }
>
> tp->t_flags |= XFS_TRANS_DIRTY;
> --
> 2.14.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html