Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Current description of the compatible property for at24 is quite vague.
>
> State explicitly that any "<manufacturer>,<model>" pair is accepted as
> long as a correct fallback is used for non-atmel chips.

> -       "atmel,24c00", "atmel,24c01", "atmel,24c02", "atmel,24c04",
> -       "atmel,24c08", "atmel,24c16", "atmel,24c32", "atmel,24c64",
> -       "atmel,24c128", "atmel,24c256", "atmel,24c512", "atmel,24c1024"

> +                "atmel,24c00",
> +                "atmel,24c01",
> +                "atmel,24c02",
> +                "atmel,spd",
> +                "atmel,24c04",

Just to whom it may concern, I still don't like the ordering.
By name is better to read and catch up the (un)supported chips.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko