Re: x86/pti: smp_processor_id() called while preemptible in resume-from-sleep

[Dave Hansen]

On 12/30/2017 10:40 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The __native_flush_tlb() function looks _very_ broken.
...
> So I'd suggest moving the preempt_disable() up to the top of that
> function, regardless of whether we could then remove that seemingly
> stale TLB flush in that crazy
> smpboot_setup/restore_warm_reset_vector() dance...

If someone is calling __native_flush_tlb(), shouldn't they already be in
a state where they can't be preempted?  It's fundamentally a one-cpu
thing, both the actual CPU TLB flush _and_ the per-cpu variables.

It seems like we might want to _remove_ the explicit
preempt_dis/enable() from here:

        preempt_disable();
        native_write_cr3(__native_read_cr3());
        preempt_enable();

and add some warnings to ensure it's disabled when we enter
__native_flush_tlb().