Re: [PATCH 01/13] powerpc/powernv: Introduce new PHB type for opencapi links

From: Andrew Donnellan
Date: Tue Jan 02 2018 - 22:53:58 EST


On 19/12/17 02:21, Frederic Barrat wrote:
The NPU was already abstracted by opal as a virtual PHB for nvlink,
but it helps to be able to differentiate between a nvlink or opencapi
PHB, as it's not completely transparent to linux. In particular, PE
assignment differs and we'll also need the information in later
patches.

So rename existing PNV_PHB_NPU type to PNV_PHB_NPU_NVLINK and add a
new type PNV_PHB_NPU_OCAPI.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c | 4 +++
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 8 ++++--
4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c
index f6cbc1a71472..c5899c107d59 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static int pnv_npu_dma_set_bypass(struct pnv_ioda_pe *npe)
int64_t rc = 0;
phys_addr_t top = memblock_end_of_DRAM();

- if (phb->type != PNV_PHB_NPU || !npe->pdev)
+ if (phb->type != PNV_PHB_NPU_NVLINK || !npe->pdev)
return -EINVAL;

rc = pnv_npu_unset_window(npe, 0);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
index 749055553064..c37b5d288f9c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
@@ -54,7 +54,8 @@
#define POWERNV_IOMMU_DEFAULT_LEVELS 1
#define POWERNV_IOMMU_MAX_LEVELS 5

-static const char * const pnv_phb_names[] = { "IODA1", "IODA2", "NPU" };
+static const char * const pnv_phb_names[] = { "IODA1", "IODA2", "NPU_NVLINK",
+ "NPU_OCAPI" };
static void pnv_pci_ioda2_table_free_pages(struct iommu_table *tbl);

void pe_level_printk(const struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe, const char *level,
@@ -924,7 +925,7 @@ static int pnv_ioda_configure_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb, struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
* Configure PELTV. NPUs don't have a PELTV table so skip
* configuration on them.
*/
- if (phb->type != PNV_PHB_NPU)
+ if (phb->type != PNV_PHB_NPU_NVLINK && phb->type != PNV_PHB_NPU_OCAPI)
pnv_ioda_set_peltv(phb, pe, true);

/* Setup reverse map */
@@ -1260,12 +1261,13 @@ static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_setup_npu_PE(struct pci_dev *npu_pdev)
return pe;
}

-static void pnv_ioda_setup_npu_PEs(struct pci_bus *bus)
+static void pnv_ioda_setup_npu_PEs(struct pci_bus *bus,
+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *fn(struct pci_dev *npu_pdev))
{
struct pci_dev *pdev;

list_for_each_entry(pdev, &bus->devices, bus_list)
- pnv_ioda_setup_npu_PE(pdev);
+ fn(pdev);
}

I think adding a function pointer here is rather ugly, at this point you might as well just do this directly in pnv_pci_ioda_setup_PEs()


static void pnv_pci_ioda_setup_PEs(void)
@@ -1275,13 +1277,18 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_setup_PEs(void)

list_for_each_entry_safe(hose, tmp, &hose_list, list_node) {
phb = hose->private_data;
- if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_NPU) {
+ if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_NPU_NVLINK) {
/* PE#0 is needed for error reporting */
pnv_ioda_reserve_pe(phb, 0);
- pnv_ioda_setup_npu_PEs(hose->bus);
+ pnv_ioda_setup_npu_PEs(hose->bus,
+ pnv_ioda_setup_npu_PE);
if (phb->model == PNV_PHB_MODEL_NPU2)
pnv_npu2_init(phb);
}
+ if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_NPU_OCAPI) {
+ pnv_ioda_setup_npu_PEs(hose->bus,
+ pnv_ioda_setup_dev_PE);
+ }
}
}


--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnellan@xxxxxxxxxxx IBM Australia Limited