Re: [PATCH 0/6] mm, hugetlb: allocation API and migration improvements

[Michal Hocko]

On Wed 03-01-18 16:05:23, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed,  3 Jan 2018 10:32:07 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I've posted this as an RFC [1] and both Mike and Naoya seem to be OK
> > both with patches and the approach. I have rebased this on top of [2]
> > because there is a small conflict in mm/mempolicy.c. I know it is late
> > in the release cycle but similarly to [2] I would really like to see
> > this in linux-next for a longer time for a wider testing exposure.
> 
> I'm interpreting this to mean "hold for 4.17-rc1"?

Yeah, that should be good enough. There shouldn't be any reason to rush
this through. I will build more changes on top but that is not critical
either. The longer this will be in linux-next, the better.

Thanks!
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs