Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] bindings: regulator: added support for suspend states

From: Chunyan Zhang
Date: Tue Jan 09 2018 - 01:09:25 EST


On 8 January 2018 at 20:35, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 02:36:36PM +0800, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
>> On 6 January 2018 at 03:18, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> > No, it means that the software has permission to use those changes to
>> > those registers - we only want to be changing things if the user has
>> > permission to change them since some systems will have specific
>> > constraints, we don't know if it's safe without being explicitly told.
>> > You're right that we could infer this from a range being provided
>> > though, let's do that.
>
>> Ok, so we don't need this property IIUC, and instead we just need to check
>> if the regulator-suspend-min-microvolt and regulator-suspend-max-microvolt
>> are set to the same value, right?
>
> Yes.

Then, do we need a flag as well to give permission to change
'suspend_state->enabled'?

Or we just do keeping the regulator device enabled if any consumer of
it has set voltage for suspend mode with non-zero value, and do
switching it off if all consumers of it have set voltage for suspend
with zero.

+static int _regulator_set_suspend_voltage(struct regulator *regulator,
+ int min_uV, int max_uV,
+ suspend_state_t state)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct regulator_dev *rdev = regulator->rdev;
+
+ /*
+ * We assume users want to switch off the regulator device for
+ * suspend state when setting min_uV and max_uV all with zero.
+ */
+ if (min_uV == 0 && max_uV == 0) {
+ regulator->voltage[state].min_uV = 0;
+ regulator->voltage[state].max_uV = 0;
+ return regulator_suspend_disable(rdev, state);
+ }
+
+ ret = regulator_suspend_enable(rdev, state);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ return regulator_set_voltage_unlocked(regulator, min_uV, max_uV, state);
+}