[tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Move CPU frequency selection triggering points

[tip-bot for Juri Lelli]

Commit-ID:  e0367b12674bf4420870cd0237e3ebafb2ec9593
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/e0367b12674bf4420870cd0237e3ebafb2ec9593
Author:     Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 11:23:19 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:30:32 +0100

sched/deadline: Move CPU frequency selection triggering points

Since SCHED_DEADLINE doesn't track utilization signal (but reserves a
fraction of CPU bandwidth to tasks admitted to the system), there is no
point in evaluating frequency changes during each tick event.

Move frequency selection triggering points to where running_bw changes.

Co-authored-by: Claudio Scordino <claudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: alessio.balsini@xxxxxxx
Cc: bristot@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx
Cc: joelaf@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: morten.rasmussen@xxxxxxx
Cc: patrick.bellasi@xxxxxxx
Cc: rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: tkjos@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: tommaso.cucinotta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171204102325.5110-3-juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c |  7 ++++---
 kernel/sched/sched.h    | 12 ++++++------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 4c666db..f584837 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ void add_running_bw(u64 dl_bw, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
 	dl_rq->running_bw += dl_bw;
 	SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_rq->running_bw < old); /* overflow */
 	SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_rq->running_bw > dl_rq->this_bw);
+	/* kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
+	cpufreq_update_util(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq), SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL);
 }
 
 static inline
@@ -98,6 +100,8 @@ void sub_running_bw(u64 dl_bw, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
 	SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_rq->running_bw > old); /* underflow */
 	if (dl_rq->running_bw > old)
 		dl_rq->running_bw = 0;
+	/* kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
+	cpufreq_update_util(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq), SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL);
 }
 
 static inline
@@ -1134,9 +1138,6 @@ static void update_curr_dl(struct rq *rq)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	/* kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
-	cpufreq_update_util(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL);
-
 	schedstat_set(curr->se.statistics.exec_max,
 		      max(curr->se.statistics.exec_max, delta_exec));
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 136ab50..863964f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -2055,14 +2055,14 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct update_util_data *, cpufreq_update_util_data);
  * The way cpufreq is currently arranged requires it to evaluate the CPU
  * performance state (frequency/voltage) on a regular basis to prevent it from
  * being stuck in a completely inadequate performance level for too long.
- * That is not guaranteed to happen if the updates are only triggered from CFS,
- * though, because they may not be coming in if RT or deadline tasks are active
- * all the time (or there are RT and DL tasks only).
+ * That is not guaranteed to happen if the updates are only triggered from CFS
+ * and DL, though, because they may not be coming in if only RT tasks are
+ * active all the time (or there are RT tasks only).
  *
- * As a workaround for that issue, this function is called by the RT and DL
- * sched classes to trigger extra cpufreq updates to prevent it from stalling,
+ * As a workaround for that issue, this function is called periodically by the
+ * RT sched class to trigger extra cpufreq updates to prevent it from stalling,
  * but that really is a band-aid.  Going forward it should be replaced with
- * solutions targeted more specifically at RT and DL tasks.
+ * solutions targeted more specifically at RT tasks.
  */
 static inline void cpufreq_update_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int flags)
 {