Re: [PATCH] ptr_ring: document usage around __ptr_ring_peek

[John Fastabend]

On 01/10/2018 06:03 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> This explains why is the net usage of __ptr_ring_peek
> actually ok without locks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> John - I think this is more or less what you meant. Is that right?

Yep, thanks for following up.

Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>