RE: [RFC PATCH 0/2] drivers: clk: Add ZynqMP clock driver support

[Jolly Shah]

Hi Sudeep,

There are 3 things:

1> IPI mailbox transport - series is already posted
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10145795/
2> EEMI - Posted by me below
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10150665/
3> EEMI Users
Currently posted as RFC as they are dependent on #2.

#2 doesnât use mailbox so it is a posted as a separate series. 

Thanks,
Jolly Shah



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sudeep Holla [mailto:sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 2:55 AM
> To: Jolly Shah <JOLLYS@xxxxxxxxxx>; michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx; sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sudeep Holla
> <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>; Jolly Shah <JOLLYS@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] drivers: clk: Add ZynqMP clock driver support
> 
> 
> 
> On 08/01/18 22:16, Jolly Shah wrote:
> > Add clock driver for ZynqMP
> >
> 
> Can you post the complete series in one set for easy of review. It's currently
> broken into *6 - 8* different sets by different authors and it's extremely hard to
> get the full view of how these pieces are connected and extremely misleading.
> Can someone post them collectively as you would already have it if you are
> doing some testing building on each patch set.
> 
> IIUC mailbox is used for all the communication, right ?
> If so, to start with just have 2 series one for mailbox/transport and another for
> the whole protocol(eemi?) and users of it.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep