Re: [PATCH 1/6] kconfig: do not call check_conf() for olddefconfig
From: Ulf Magnusson
Date: Fri Jan 12 2018 - 11:49:49 EST
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:26 PM, Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:56 AM, Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> check_conf() traverses the menu tree, but it is completely no-op for
>> olddefconfig because the following if-else block does nothing.
>>
>> if (input_mode == listnewconfig) {
>> ...
>> } else if (input_mode != olddefconfig) {
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> As the help message says, olddefconfig automatically sets new symbols
>> to their default value. There is no room for manual intervention.
>> So, calling check_conf() for olddefconfig is odd in the first place.
>> Rather, olddefconfig belongs to the group of alldefconfig and defconfig.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> scripts/kconfig/conf.c | 10 +++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/conf.c b/scripts/kconfig/conf.c
>> index 866369f..52cbe5d 100644
>> --- a/scripts/kconfig/conf.c
>> +++ b/scripts/kconfig/conf.c
>> @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ static void check_conf(struct menu *menu)
>> if (sym->name && !sym_is_choice_value(sym)) {
>> printf("%s%s\n", CONFIG_, sym->name);
>> }
>> - } else if (input_mode != olddefconfig) {
>> + } else {
>> if (!conf_cnt++)
>> printf(_("*\n* Restart config...\n*\n"));
>> rootEntry = menu_get_parent_menu(menu);
>> @@ -674,15 +674,15 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>> /* fall through */
>> case oldconfig:
>> case listnewconfig:
>> - case olddefconfig:
>> case silentoldconfig:
>> /* Update until a loop caused no more changes */
>> do {
>> conf_cnt = 0;
>> check_conf(&rootmenu);
>> - } while (conf_cnt &&
>> - (input_mode != listnewconfig &&
>> - input_mode != olddefconfig));
>> + } while (conf_cnt && input_mode != listnewconfig);
>> + break;
>> + case olddefconfig:
>> + default:
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>
> Acked-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Cheers,
> Ulf
Should have been Reviewed-by, obviously. Sorry about that. :)
Cheers,
Ulf