Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] EDAC: armada_xp: Add support for more SoCs
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Fri Jan 12 2018 - 13:48:11 EST
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 02:27:55PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> The Armada 38x and other integrated SoCs use a reduced pin count so the
> width of the SDRAM interface is smaller than the Armada XP SoCs. This
> means that the definition of "full" and "half" width is reduced from
> 64/32 to 32/16.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/edac/armada_xp_edac.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/armada_xp_edac.c b/drivers/edac/armada_xp_edac.c
> index 70cff01afc8d..03a18b54467a 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/armada_xp_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/armada_xp_edac.c
> @@ -341,6 +341,11 @@ static int axp_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> axp_mc_read_config(mci);
>
> + /* These SoCs have a reduced width bus */
> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("marvell,armada380") ||
> + of_machine_is_compatible("marvell,armadaxp-98dx3236"))
> + drvdata->width /= 2;
> +
> /* configure SBE threshold */
> /* it seems that SBEs are not captured otherwise */
> writel(1 << SDRAM_ERR_CTRL_THR_OFFSET, drvdata->base + SDRAM_ERR_CTRL_REG);
> --
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.