On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 09:32 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:42:22AM +0800, Jianchao Wang wrote:
Customer reported memory corruption issue on previous mlx4_en driver
version where the order-3 pages and multiple page reference counting
were still used.
Finally, find out one of the root causes is that the HW may see stale
rx_descs due to prod db updating reaches HW before rx_desc. Especially
when cross order-3 pages boundary and update a new one, HW may write
on the pages which may has been freed and allocated again by others.
To fix it, add a wmb between rx_desc and prod db updating to ensure
the order. Even thougth order-0 and page recycling has been introduced,
the disorder between rx_desc and prod db still could lead to corruption
on different inbound packages.
Signed-off-by: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
index 85e28ef..eefa82c 100644
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static void mlx4_en_refill_rx_buffers(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
break;
ring->prod++;
} while (likely(--missing));
-
+ wmb(); /* ensure rx_desc updating reaches HW before prod db updating */
mlx4_en_update_rx_prod_db(ring);
}
Does this need to be dma_wmb(), and should it be in
mlx4_en_update_rx_prod_db ?
+1 on dma_wmb()
On what architecture bug was observed ?
In any case, the barrier should be moved in mlx4_en_update_rx_prod_db()
I think.