Re: [PATCH 2/3] objtool: Ignore retpoline alternatives

[Ingo Molnar]

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > But if you're an actual human, the "small numbers as labels" is fine.
> 
> I find descriptive labels much nicer than random numbers, I'll take some
> crazy characters if so required.
> 
> 
> Consider the retpoline thing:
> 
>  call .Lset_up_target
> .Lcapture_spec:
>   pause
>   jmp .Lcapture_spec
> .Lset_up_target:
>   mov %r11, (%rsp);
>   ret;
> 
> 
> over:
> 
>  call 2f
> 1:
>  pause
>  jmp 1b
> 2:
>  mov %r11, (%rsp)
>  ret
> 
> 
> give me the first any day of the week.

Absolutely, in fact I detest what we have:

+#define __FILL_RETURN_BUFFER(reg, nr, sp)      \
+       mov     $(nr/2), reg;                   \
+771:                                           \
+       call    772f;                           \
+773:   /* speculation trap */                  \
+       pause;                                  \
+       jmp     773b;                           \
+772:                                           \
+       call    774f;                           \
+775:   /* speculation trap */                  \
+       pause;                                  \
+       jmp     775b;                           \
+774:                                           \
+       dec     reg;                            \
+       jnz     771b;                           \
+       add     $(BITS_PER_LONG/8) * nr, sp;

I mean, WTF??

Also, note that this:

>  call .Lset_up_target
> .Lcapture_spec:
>   pause
>   jmp .Lcapture_spec
> .Lset_up_target:
>   mov %r11, (%rsp);
>   ret;
> 

becomes even more readable with a bit more human-readability improvements:

	call .L_set_up_target

 .L_capture_spec:
	pause
	jmp .L_capture_spec

 .L_set_up_target:
	mov %r11, (%rsp)
	ret 

I.e. the underscores in the label names, the tabs and the newlines create better 
vertical and horizontal separation between the syntactical elements and provide 
grouping of larger constructs.

Thanks,

	Ingo