Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] fs: fat: add ioctl method in fat filesystem driver

[OGAWA Hirofumi]

ChenGuanqiao <chen.chenchacha@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> +static int fat_check_d_characters(char *label, unsigned long len)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < len; ++i) {
> +		switch (label[i]) {
> +		case '0' ... '9':
> +		case 'A' ... 'Z':
> +		case '_':
> +		case 0x20:
> +			continue;

I didn't check though, what windows do if label = "a b c"? (I.e. invalid
name as dirent name)

> +static int fat_ioctl_get_volume_label(struct inode *inode,
> +				      u8 __user *vol_label)
> +{
> +	int err = 0;
> +	struct buffer_head *bh;
> +	struct msdos_dir_entry *de;
> +	struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
> +	char buffer[MSDOS_NAME] = {0};

Why initialize buffer?

> +	inode = d_inode(sb->s_root);
> +
> +	err = fat_get_volume_label_entry(inode, &bh, &de);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto out;

The dir traverse has to be had lock.

> +	inode_lock_shared(inode);
> +	memcpy(buffer, de->name, MSDOS_NAME);
> +	brelse(bh);
> +	inode_unlock_shared(inode);
> +
> +	if (copy_to_user(vol_label, buffer, MSDOS_NAME))
> +		err = -EFAULT;

No issue to copy to user memory under locking.

> +static int fat_ioctl_set_volume_label(struct file *file,
> +				      u8 __user *vol_label)
> +{

[...]

> +	err = fat_check_d_characters(label, sizeof(label));
> +	if (err)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	err = mnt_want_write_file(file);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	down_write(&sb->s_umount);
> +	inode_lock(inode);

BTW, lock order is tested with LOCKDEP?

> +	/* Synchronize the data together */
> +	err = sync_dirty_buffer(boot_bh);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto out_boot_brelse;

> +	err = sync_dirty_buffer(vol_bh);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto out_boot_brelse;

Probably, we don't need to sync vol_bh. And in the case of adding new
entry, now already doesn't sync.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>