RE: [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: max98373: Changed SPDX header in C++ comments style

[Ryan Lee]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@xxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 2:30 AM
>To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
>Cc: Ryan Lee <RyanS.Lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx; ryan.lee.maxim@xxxxxxxxx; perex@xxxxxxxx; linux-
>kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: max98373: Changed SPDX header in C++
>comments style
>
>On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:21:56AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> Mark Brown wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:01:58PM -0800, Ryan Lee wrote:
>
>> > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> > > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> > >  /* Copyright (c) 2017, Maxim Integrated */
>
>> > Please change the entire header to C++, mixing C and C++ on adjacent
>> > lines looks ugly.
>
>> I'm not sure whether it's a good direction to go, either.
>
>> I rather wonder why SPDX line *must* be in C++ comment style...
>
>Apparently it's to remove any ambiguity for the tooling or something, plus Linus
>decided he likes C++ comments.
>
>I don't understand why this isn't done as a macro like MODULE_LICENSE() and
>so on but the decision was rushed through and not really publicised
>:9

Thank you for your feedback.
I modified two header lines in C++ comment style and send it again.