Re: [RFC PATCH] blk-mq: fixup RESTART when queue becomes idle
From: Ming Lei
Date: Fri Jan 19 2018 - 10:34:03 EST
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 03:20:13PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 15:26 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Please see queue_delayed_work_on(), hctx->run_work is shared by all
> > scheduling, once blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(100ms) returns, no new
> > scheduling can make progress during the 100ms.
>
> How about addressing that as follows:
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index f7515dd95a36..57f8379a476d 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1403,9 +1403,9 @@ static void __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async,
> put_cpu();
> }
>
> - kblockd_schedule_delayed_work_on(blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(hctx),
> - &hctx->run_work,
> - msecs_to_jiffies(msecs));
> + kblockd_mod_delayed_work_on(blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(hctx),
> + &hctx->run_work,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(msecs));
> }
>
> void blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, unsigned long msecs)
>
> Bart.
Yes, this one together with Jen's suggestion with returning
BLK_STS_NO_DEV_RESOURCE should fix this issue.
Could you cook a fix for this issue? Otherwise I am happy to do
that.
--
Ming