Re: [PATCH v6 06/36] nds32: Kernel booting and initialization
From: Greentime Hu
Date: Mon Jan 22 2018 - 04:50:21 EST
2018-01-20 0:41 GMT+08:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Greentime Hu <green.hu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi, Arnd:
>>
>> 2018-01-18 18:11 GMT+08:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>:
>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Greentime Hu <green.hu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> I had not looked at this patch in enough detail earlier, sorry about
>>> that. It should be
>>> easy enough to fix though.
>>>
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE
>>>> +struct screen_info screen_info;
>>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> I would assume that you can't ever have a VGA console. Just drop all
>>> the references
>>> here and instead send a patch to the fbdev maintainer to add the dependency
>>> at CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE to prevent selecting it with nds32.
>>
>> I found it can be built pass for now because we disable it in defconfig.
>> Should I send the patch in v7 series?
>
> yes, I think that would be best.
>
>>>> +
>>>> +extern void __init early_init_devtree(void *params);
>>>> +extern void __init early_trap_init(void);
>>>
>>> similarly, these are declared in include/linux/of_fdt.h
>>>
>>
>> early_trap_init is a nds32 function. I will move it to nds32.h
>
> Right, makes sense.
>
>>>> +void calibrate_delay(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> + const int *val;
>>>> + struct device_node *cpu = NULL;
>>>> + cpu = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "andestech,nds32v3");
>>>> + val = of_get_property(cpu, "clock-frequency", NULL);
>>>> + if (!val || !*val)
>>>> + panic("no cpu 'clock-frequency' parameter in device tree");
>>>> + loops_per_jiffy = be32_to_cpup(val) / HZ;
>>>> + pr_cont("%lu.%02lu BogoMIPS (lpj=%lu)\n",
>>>> + loops_per_jiffy / (500000 / HZ),
>>>> + (loops_per_jiffy / (5000 / HZ)) % 100, loops_per_jiffy);
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> This seems very odd to me: The 'clock-frequency' property in the
>>> cpu node should refer to the actual frequency it is running at, but that
>>> tends to be different from the bogomips as needed by the ndelay()
>>> function. Can you explain what is going on here?
>>>
>>
>> This implementation is referenced from openrisc.
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/17/228
>
> It's correct on openrisc, because that has a reliable cycle counter,
> and that gets used in its delay function:
>
> void __delay(unsigned long cycles)
> {
> cycles_t start = get_cycles();
> while ((get_cycles() - start) < cycles)
> cpu_relax();
> }
>
> In my review comment that you cited, I assumed that nds32 had similar
> hardware.
>
> However, as you explained earlier, the nds32 architecture does not provide
> a cycle counter and the clocksource resolution is not high enough to
> be a good replacement, so you have to use the traditional delay
> calibration.
>
Hi, Arnd:
Thank you for your explanation.
Will it be ok if I code it like this?
config GENERIC_CALIBRATE_DELAY
def_bool y