Some of the drivers may use the macro at runtime flow, like
struct property_entry p[10];
...
p[index++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8("u8 property", u8_data);
In that case and absence of the data type compiler fails the build:
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_dmi.c:79:29: error: Expected ; at end of statement
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_dmi.c:79:29: error: got {
Cc: Corey Minyard <minyard@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/property.h | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h
index 7eefaf2f22b9..f144be4f99e0 100644
--- a/include/linux/property.h
+++ b/include/linux/property.h
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ struct property_entry {
*/
#define PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER_ARRAY(_name_, _type_, _Type_, _val_) \
-{ \
+(struct property_entry) { \
.name = _name_, \
.length = ARRAY_SIZE(_val_) * sizeof(_type_), \
.is_array = true, \
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ struct property_entry {
PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER_ARRAY(_name_, u64, U64, _val_)
#define PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING_ARRAY(_name_, _val_) \
-{ \
+(struct property_entry) { \
.name = _name_, \
.length = ARRAY_SIZE(_val_) * sizeof(const char *), \
.is_array = true, \
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ struct property_entry {
}
#define PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER(_name_, _type_, _Type_, _val_) \
-{ \
+(struct property_entry) { \
.name = _name_, \
.length = sizeof(_type_), \
.type = DEV_PROP_##_Type_, \
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ struct property_entry {
PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER(_name_, u64, U64, _val_)
#define PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING(_name_, _val_) \
-{ \
+(struct property_entry) { \
.name = _name_, \
.length = sizeof(_val_), \
.type = DEV_PROP_STRING, \
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ struct property_entry {
}
#define PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL(_name_) \
-{ \
+(struct property_entry) { \
.name = _name_, \
}