Re: [PATCH] mips: dts: Remove leading 0x and 0s from bindings notation

[James Hogan]

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 05:53:56PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Improve the DTS files by removing all the leading "0x" and zeros to fix the
> following dtc warnings:
> 
> Warning (unit_address_format): Node /XXX unit name should not have leading "0x"
> 
> and
> 
> Warning (unit_address_format): Node /XXX unit name should not have leading 0s
> 
> Converted using the following command:
> 
> find . -type f \( -iname *.dts -o -iname *.dtsi \) -exec sed -E -i -e "s/@0x([0-9a-fA-F\.]+)\s?\{/@\L\1 \{/g" -e "s/@0+([0-9a-fA-F\.]+)\s?\{/@\L\1 \{/g" {} +
> 
> For simplicity, two sed expressions were used to solve each warnings separately.
> 
> To make the regex expression more robust a few other issues were resolved,
> namely setting unit-address to lower case, and adding a whitespace before the
> the opening curly brace:
> 
> https://elinux.org/Device_Tree_Linux#Linux_conventions
> 
> This is a follow up to commit 4c9847b7375a ("dt-bindings: Remove leading 0x from bindings notation")
> 
> Reported-by: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/mips/boot/dts/img/boston.dts   | 2 +-
>  arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts | 8 ++++----
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/img/boston.dts b/arch/mips/boot/dts/img/boston.dts
> index 2cd49b60e030..1bd105428f61 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/img/boston.dts
> +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/img/boston.dts
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@
>  					#address-cells = <1>;
>  					#size-cells = <0>;
>  
> -					rtc@0x68 {
> +					rtc@68 {
>  						compatible = "st,m41t81s";
>  						reg = <0x68>;
>  					};
> diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts
> index a4cc52214dbd..7d5e49e40b0d 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts
> +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts
> @@ -110,22 +110,22 @@
>  					reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x800000>;
>  				};
>  
> -				partition@0x800000 {
> +				partition@800000 {
>  					label = "u-boot";
>  					reg = <0x0 0x800000 0x0 0x200000>;
>  				};
>  
> -				partition@0xa00000 {
> +				partition@a00000 {
>  					label = "u-boot-env";
>  					reg = <0x0 0xa00000 0x0 0x200000>;
>  				};
>  
> -				partition@0xc00000 {
> +				partition@c00000 {
>  					label = "boot";
>  					reg = <0x0 0xc00000 0x0 0x4000000>;
>  				};
>  
> -				partition@0x8c00000 {
> +				partition@8c00000 {
>  					label = "system";
>  					reg = <0x0 0x4c00000 0x1 0xfb400000>;

should that one actually be called partition@4c00000?

Cheers
James

>  				};
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature