Re: [PATCH 11/14] MIPS: memblock: Print out kernel virtual mem layout

From: Serge Semin
Date: Tue Jan 23 2018 - 14:10:46 EST


Hello Matt,

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 03:35:14PM +0000, Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Serge,
>
> On 19/01/18 14:27, Serge Semin wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 07:59:43AM +0000, Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >Hello Matt,
> >
> >>Hi Serge,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On 18/01/18 20:18, Serge Semin wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:03:03PM -0800, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>On 01/17/2018 02:23 PM, Serge Semin wrote:
> >>>>>It is useful to have the kernel virtual memory layout printed
> >>>>>at boot time so to have the full information about the booted
> >>>>>kernel. In some cases it might be unsafe to have virtual
> >>>>>addresses freely visible in logs, so the %pK format is used if
> >>>>>one want to hide them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>>I personally like having that information because that helps debug and
> >>>>have a quick reference, but there appears to be a trend to remove this
> >>>>in the name of security:
> >>>>
> >>>>https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10124007/
> >>>>
> >>>>maybe hide this behind a configuration option?
> >>>
> >>>Yeah, arm code was the place I picked the function up.) But in my case
> >>>I've used %pK so the pointers would disappear from logging when
> >>>kptr_restrict sysctl is 1 or 2.
> >>>I agree, that we might need to make the printouts optional. If there is
> >>>any kernel config, which for instance increases the kernel security we
> >>>could also use it or anything else to discard the printouts at compile
> >>>time.
> >>
> >>
> >>Certainly, when KASLR is active it would be preferable to hide this
> >>information, so you could use CONFIG_RELOCATABLE. The existing KASLR stuff
> >>additionally hides this kind of information behind CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, so
> >>that only people actively debugging the kernel see it:
> >>
> >>http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/v4.15-rc8/source/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c#L604
> >
> >Ok. I'll hide the printouts behind both of that config macros in the next patchset
> >version.
>
>
> Another thing to note - since ad67b74d2469d ("printk: hash addresses printed
> with %p") %pK at this time in the boot process is useless since the RNG is
> not sufficiently initialised and all prints end up being "(ptrval)". Hence
> after v4.15-rc2 we end up with output like:
>
> [ 0.000000] Kernel virtual memory layout:
> [ 0.000000] lowmem : 0x(ptrval) - 0x(ptrval) ( 256 MB)
> [ 0.000000] .text : 0x(ptrval) - 0x(ptrval) (7374 kB)
> [ 0.000000] .data : 0x(ptrval) - 0x(ptrval) (1901 kB)
> [ 0.000000] .init : 0x(ptrval) - 0x(ptrval) (1600 kB)
> [ 0.000000] .bss : 0x(ptrval) - 0x(ptrval) ( 415 kB)
> [ 0.000000] vmalloc : 0x(ptrval) - 0x(ptrval) (1023 MB)
> [ 0.000000] fixmap : 0x(ptrval) - 0x(ptrval) ( 68 kB)
>

It must be some bug in the algo. What point in the %pK then? According to
the documentation the only way to see the pointers is when (kptr_restrict == 0).
But if it is we don't get into the restricted_pointer() method at all:
http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/v4.15-rc9/source/lib/vsprintf.c#L1934
In this case the vsprintf() executes the method ptr_to_id(), which of course
default to _not_ leak addresses, and hash it before printing.

Really %pK isn't supposed to be dependent from RNG at all since kptr_restrict
doesn't do any value randomization.

>
> The %px format specifier was added for cases such as this, where we really
> want to print the unmodified address. And as long as this function is
> suitably guarded to only do this when KASLR is deactivated /
> CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL is activated, etc, then we are not unwittingly leaking
> information - we are deliberately making it available.
>

If %pK would work as it's stated by the kernel documentation:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/printk-formats.txt
then the only change I'd suggest to have here is to close the kernel memory
layout printout method by the CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL ifdef-macro. The kptr_restrict
should default to 1/2 if the KASLR is activated:
https://lwn.net/Articles/444556/

Regards,
-Sergey

> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> >
> >Regards,
> >-Sergey
> >
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Matt
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>Florian