Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 057/100] nfsd: Ensure we don't recognise lock stateids after freeing them

From: Sasha Levin
Date: Wed Jan 24 2018 - 12:28:12 EST

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] x86/cpufeature: Blacklist SPEC_CTRL on early Spectre v2 microcodes"
Previous message: Sasha Levin: "Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.9 38/55] fs/mbcache.c: make count_objects() more robust"
In reply to: J. Bruce Fields: "Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 057/100] nfsd: Ensure we don't recognise lock stateids after freeing them"
Next in thread: Eric Anholt: "Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 001/100] drm/vc4: Account for interrupts in flight"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:47:09AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>Chuck Lever found this caused a regression, and Trond's fix hasn't hit
>Linus's tree yet.

I'll remove it from all trees for now, thanks!

--
Thanks,
Sasha

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] x86/cpufeature: Blacklist SPEC_CTRL on early Spectre v2 microcodes"
Previous message: Sasha Levin: "Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.9 38/55] fs/mbcache.c: make count_objects() more robust"
In reply to: J. Bruce Fields: "Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 057/100] nfsd: Ensure we don't recognise lock stateids after freeing them"
Next in thread: Eric Anholt: "Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 001/100] drm/vc4: Account for interrupts in flight"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]