Re: [PATCHv2] musb_host: fix lockup on rxcsr_h_error

[Maxim Uvarov]

[1] says that issue is with back ported driver to 3.12.10. Can the
latest kernel be tested on the same hw?

Maxim.

2018-01-25 18:45 GMT+03:00 Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx>:
> Hi Yegor and Max,
>
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 04:25:58PM +0200, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
>> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:03:52PM +0200, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 09:51:37AM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > [snip]
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hello Bin,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> yes, it also works with that reset and go to finish:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c
>> >> >> index c3d5fc9..8cd98e7 100644
>> >> >> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c
>> >> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c
>> >> >> @@ -1599,6 +1599,10 @@ void musb_host_rx(struct musb *musb, u8 epnum)
>> >> >>                 status = -EPROTO;
>> >> >>                 musb_writeb(epio, MUSB_RXINTERVAL, 0);
>> >> >>
>> >> >> +               rx_csr &= ~MUSB_RXCSR_H_ERROR;
>> >> >> +               musb_writew(epio, MUSB_RXCSR, rx_csr);
>> >> >> +
>> >> >> +               goto finish;
>> >> >>         } else if (rx_csr & MUSB_RXCSR_DATAERROR) {
>> >> >>
>> >> >>                 if (USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_ISOC != qh->type) {
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for testing it.
>> >>
>> >> Have tested your patch and now both FT4232 and Huawei don't freeze on removal.
>> >>
>> >> Bin, Max thanks for fixing this issue.
>> >>
>> >> Tested-by: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > Thanks for testing.
>> >
>> > Can you please test the patch [1] instead? I'd like to use it as the
>> > fix.
>> >
>> > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=146222355213935&w=2
>>
>> The patch behaves the same as the previous one.
>
> Sorry for bringing up this old thread, but it seems to be too aggressive
> to stop scheduling further urbs on errors [1]. So is it possible for you
> to re-test your usecase by reverting commit
>
>     dbac5d07d13e ("usb: musb: host: don't start next rx urb if current one failed")
>
> to see if only commit
>
>     b5801212229f ("usb: musb: host: clear rxcsr error bit if set")
>
> itself solves your issue?
>
> I know you have tested the patch in [2], which is similar to commit
> b5801212229f, but tha latter doesn't have 'goto finish' which does dma
> cleanup on errors, it makes more sense to me. But I'd like to have you
> tested with reverting dbac5d07d13e to be sure.
>
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=151689238420622&w=2
> [2] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146185425805967&w=2
>
> thanks,
> -Bin.
>



-- 
Best regards,
Maxim Uvarov