Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: enable HWP before manipulating on corresponding registers
From: Yu Chen
Date: Fri Jan 26 2018 - 01:32:01 EST
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 02:44:59PM -0800, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 19:08 +0800, Yu Chen wrote:
>
> Thanks for debugging.
>
> > The following warning was triggered after resumed from S3 -
> > if all the nonboot CPUs were put offline before suspend:
> >
> > [ 1840.329515] unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x771 at rIP:
> > 0xffffffff86061e3a (native_read_msr+0xa/0x30)
> [...]
>
> [ 1840.329556] acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed+0x65/0x80
>
> This is the problem. You are getting a _PPC during resume which needs
> _PSS table to really do anything.
>
OK.
> So the correct fix should not in intel_pstate IMO but
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
> b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
> index 18b72ee..c7cf48a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ void acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(struct
> acpi_processor *pr, int event_flag)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - if (ignore_ppc) {
> + if (ignore_ppc || !pr->performance) {
> /*
> * Only when it is notification event, the _OST object
> * will be evaluated. Otherwise it is skipped.
>
>
> ...
> Since we don't call acpi_processor_register_performance(), the pr-
> >performance will be NULL. When this is NULL we don't need to do PPC
> change notification.
> Even if we register performance, processing a PPC notification is
> complex as we have to wait for PPC=0 before enabling HWP otherwise we
> will be stuck with low performance (The event may not come once in HWP
> is in control).
>
OK.
> The important bug which you identified need a fix in resume when
> maxcpus=1.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index 93a0e88..10e5efc 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -779,13 +779,16 @@ static int intel_pstate_hwp_save_state(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void intel_pstate_hwp_enable(struct cpudata *cpudata);
> +
> static int intel_pstate_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> if (!hwp_active)
> return 0;
>
> mutex_lock(&intel_pstate_limits_lock);
> -
> + if (!policy->cpu)
The 'if' statement might not be needed, as intel_pstate_resume()
is always invoked on boot cpu IMO.
Thanks,
Yu
> + intel_pstate_hwp_enable(all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]);
> all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]->epp_policy = 0;
> intel_pstate_hwp_set(policy->cpu);
>