Re: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: bmc150: Check for a second ACPI device for BOSC0200

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:07:02 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Jonathan Cameron
> <jic23@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 10:43:30 +0000
> > Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> >> On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 21:24:01 +0000
> >> Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> >> > On 12/10/2017 12:21 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:  
> >> > > On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 17:52:34 +0000
> >> > > Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> 
> >> > >> Some BOSC0200 acpi_device-s describe two accelerometers in a single ACPI
> >> > >> device. Check for a companion device and handle a second i2c_client
> >> > >> if it is present.  
> 
> >> > I didn't see this land anywhere (I was looking in
> >> > git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git, maybe that's not
> >> > the right place?) and I just wanted to make sure this didn't get lost in
> >> > the holiday shuffle.  
> >> It did indeed get lost - thanks for the reminder.  Now applied to the
> >> togreg branch of iio.git.  However, unfortunately we may be too near
> >> to the merge window opening for it to make it.  Depends on what Linus
> >> says later today when rc8 comes out.  
> >
> > I've added some #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI defenses against the case
> > of no ACPI support being compiled in.  Alternative would be to add
> > stubs for those functions that don't have them...
> >
> > probably just acpi_device_hid.
> >
> > But that would take much longer.  Feel free to propose it and a patch
> > removing the ifdef fun if you like!  
> 
> Where can I see the patch?
> 

Doh. I clearly forgot to push out.  Should be able to push to
iio.git on kernel.org later.

Jonathan