Re: [PATCH 5/8] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Introduce the cpu idle cooling driver
From: Vincent Guittot
Date: Wed Jan 31 2018 - 04:46:46 EST
On 31 January 2018 at 10:33, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 31/01/2018 10:01, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> On 23 January 2018 at 16:34, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> [ ... ] (please trim :)
>
>>> + /*
>>> + * Each cooling device is per package. Each package
>>> + * has a set of cpus where the physical number is
>>> + * duplicate in the kernel namespace. We need a way to
>>> + * address the waitq[] and tsk[] arrays with index
>>> + * which are not Linux cpu numbered.
>>> + *
>>> + * One solution is to use the
>>> + * topology_core_id(cpu). Other solution is to use the
>>> + * modulo.
>>> + *
>>> + * eg. 2 x cluster - 4 cores.
>>> + *
>>> + * Physical numbering -> Linux numbering -> % nr_cpus
>>> + *
>>> + * Pkg0 - Cpu0 -> 0 -> 0
>>> + * Pkg0 - Cpu1 -> 1 -> 1
>>> + * Pkg0 - Cpu2 -> 2 -> 2
>>> + * Pkg0 - Cpu3 -> 3 -> 3
>>> + *
>>> + * Pkg1 - Cpu0 -> 4 -> 0
>>> + * Pkg1 - Cpu1 -> 5 -> 1
>>> + * Pkg1 - Cpu2 -> 6 -> 2
>>> + * Pkg1 - Cpu3 -> 7 -> 3
>>
>>
>> I'm not sure that the assumption above for the CPU numbering is safe.
>> Can't you use a per cpu structure to point to resources that are per
>> cpu instead ? so you will not have to rely on CPU ordering
>
> Can you elaborate ? I don't get the part with the percpu structure.
Something like:
struct cpuidle_cooling_cpu {
struct task_struct *tsk;
wait_queue_head_t waitq;
};
DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_cooling_cpu *, cpu_data);
>
>
> --
> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
>
> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
>