Re: [GIT PULL] f2fs update for 4.16-rc1

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Jaegeuk,

On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:25:35 -0800 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 01/31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:32:20 -0800 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> > >
> > > Could you please consider the below pull request?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > The following changes since commit ace52288edf0cb5e7a52b681f057f86224c49c27:
> > > 
> > >   Merge tag 'for-linus-20171218' of git://git.infradead.org/linux-mtd (2017-12-18 16:18:01 -0800)
> > > 
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > 
> > >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git tags/f2fs-for-4.16-rc1
> > > 
> > > for you to fetch changes up to 1c1d35df71104c76a4a2e25862926f22c334c9d6:
> > > 
> > >   f2fs: support inode creation time (2018-01-25 14:10:39 -0800)  
> > 
> > This has an interesting conflict with the btrfs tree:
> > 
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > After merging the f2fs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > /home/sfr/next/next/fs/f2fs/super.c: In function 'f2fs_fill_super':
> > /home/sfr/next/next/fs/f2fs/super.c:2563:18: error: 'SB_I_CGROUPWB' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'S_CGROUPWB'?
> >   sb->s_iflags |= SB_I_CGROUPWB;
> >                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >                   S_CGROUPWB
> > 
> > Caused by commit
> > 
> >   578c647879f7 ("f2fs: implement cgroup writeback support")
> > 
> > interacting with commit
> > 
> >   34934189a3dd ("cgroup, writeback: replace SB_I_CGROUPWB with per-inode S_CGROUPWB"
> > 
> > from the btrfs tree.
> > 
> > I have reverted the f2fs tree commit for today, but a better resolution
> > would be appreciated.
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > I have seen no response to the above email and have been reverting that
> > commit since Jan 18.  
> 
> I think this can be addressed by:
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> index 89c838bfb067..c743b73976d0 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> @@ -48,9 +48,10 @@ void f2fs_set_inode_flags(struct inode *inode)
>                 new_fl |= S_DIRSYNC;
>         if (f2fs_encrypted_inode(inode))
>                 new_fl |= S_ENCRYPTED;
> +       new_fl |= S_CGROUPWB;
>         inode_set_flags(inode, new_fl,
>                         S_SYNC|S_APPEND|S_IMMUTABLE|S_NOATIME|S_DIRSYNC|
> -                       S_ENCRYPTED);
> +                       S_ENCRYPTED|S_CGROUPWB);
>  }
> 
>  static void __get_inode_rdev(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_inode *ri)
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 8173ae688814..ebcd58476fc7 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -2560,7 +2560,6 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>         sb->s_flags = (sb->s_flags & ~SB_POSIXACL) |
>                 (test_opt(sbi, POSIX_ACL) ? SB_POSIXACL : 0);
>         memcpy(&sb->s_uuid, raw_super->uuid, sizeof(raw_super->uuid));
> -       sb->s_iflags |= SB_I_CGROUPWB;
> 
>         /* init f2fs-specific super block info */
>         sbi->valid_super_block = valid_super_block;
> 

I have applied that (by hand) as a merge fix patch for the merge of teh
btrfs tree for today.  Thanks for the resolution.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell