Re: [PATCH v3 14/18] firmware/psci: Expose SMCCC version through psci_ops

From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Thu Feb 01 2018 - 07:48:45 EST


On 01/02/18 12:32, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 01/02/18 11:46, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Since PSCI 1.0 allows the SMCCC version to be (indirectly) probed,
>> let's do that at boot time, and expose the version of the calling
>> convention as part of the psci_ops structure.
>>
>> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/firmware/psci.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/psci.h | 6 ++++++
>> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
>> index e9493da2b111..8631906c414c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
>> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ bool psci_tos_resident_on(int cpu)
>>
>> struct psci_operations psci_ops = {
>> .conduit = PSCI_CONDUIT_NONE,
>> + .smccc_version = SMCCC_VERSION_1_0,
>> };
>>
>> typedef unsigned long (psci_fn)(unsigned long, unsigned long,
>> @@ -511,6 +512,23 @@ static void __init psci_init_migrate(void)
>> pr_info("Trusted OS resident on physical CPU 0x%lx\n", cpuid);
>> }
>>
>> +static void __init psci_init_smccc(u32 ver)
>> +{
>> + int feature;
>> +
>> + feature = psci_features(ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_FUNC_ID);
>> +
>> + if (feature != PSCI_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
>> + ver = invoke_psci_fn(ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_FUNC_ID, 0, 0, 0);
>> + if (ver != ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_1_1)
>> + psci_ops.smccc_version = SMCCC_VERSION_1_0;
>
> AFAICS, unless you somehow run psci_probe() twice *and* have
> schizophrenic firmware, this assignment now does precisely nothing.

That's a leftover of a previous tracing hack I had... Embarrassing.

> With the condition flipped and the redundant else case removed (or an
> explanation of why I'm wrong...)
>
> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...