Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/memory-model: clarify the origin/scope of the tool name

From: Alan Stern
Date: Thu Feb 01 2018 - 10:26:59 EST


On Thu, 1 Feb 2018, Andrea Parri wrote:

> Ingo pointed out that:
>
> "The "memory model" name is overly generic, ambiguous and somewhat
> misleading, as we usually mean the virtual memory layout/model
> when we say "memory model". GCC too uses it in that sense [...]"
>
> Make it clearer that, in the context of tools/memory-model/, the term
> "memory-model" is used as shorthand for "memory consistency model" by
> calling out this convention in tools/memory-model/README.
>
> Stick to the full name in sources' headers and for the subsystem name.
>
> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx>

For both patches:

Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>