Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: Add GPIO driver for Spreadtrum SC9860 platform

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:04 AM, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The Spreadtrum SC9860 platform GPIO controller contains 16 groups and
> each group contains 16 GPIOs. Each GPIO can set input/output and has
> the interrupt capability.

Just noticed couple of more improvements you can do.

> +       case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> +               sprd_gpio_update(chip, offset, SPRD_GPIO_IS, 0);
> +               sprd_gpio_update(chip, offset, SPRD_GPIO_IBE, 0);
> +               sprd_gpio_update(chip, offset, SPRD_GPIO_IEV, 1);
> +               irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_edge_irq);
> +               break;
> +       case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> +               sprd_gpio_update(chip, offset, SPRD_GPIO_IS, 0);
> +               sprd_gpio_update(chip, offset, SPRD_GPIO_IBE, 0);
> +               sprd_gpio_update(chip, offset, SPRD_GPIO_IEV, 0);
> +               irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_edge_irq);
> +               break;
> +       case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH:
> +               sprd_gpio_update(chip, offset, SPRD_GPIO_IS, 0);
> +               sprd_gpio_update(chip, offset, SPRD_GPIO_IBE, 1);
> +               irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_edge_irq);
> +               break;
> +       case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> +               sprd_gpio_update(chip, offset, SPRD_GPIO_IS, 1);
> +               sprd_gpio_update(chip, offset, SPRD_GPIO_IBE, 0);
> +               sprd_gpio_update(chip, offset, SPRD_GPIO_IEV, 1);
> +               irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_level_irq);
> +               break;
> +       case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> +               sprd_gpio_update(chip, offset, SPRD_GPIO_IS, 1);
> +               sprd_gpio_update(chip, offset, SPRD_GPIO_IBE, 0);
> +               sprd_gpio_update(chip, offset, SPRD_GPIO_IEV, 0);
> +               irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_level_irq);
> +               break;
> +       default:
> +               return -EINVAL;

I guess you can use fallthrough and reduce some lines, but I have no
strong opinion which will look better.

> +       res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +       sprd_gpio->base = devm_ioremap_nocache(&pdev->dev, res->start,
> +                                              resource_size(res));

Didn't notice before, why not to simple call devm_ioremap_resource() ?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko