Re: [PATCH 4.15 00/55] 4.15.1-stable review

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Sat Feb 03 2018 - 03:20:34 EST


On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 10:35:19PM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:58:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.1 release.
> > There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun Feb 4 14:07:50 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.15.1-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> Results from Linaroâs test farm.
>
> No regressions since 4.15 release, but you'll notice high failure counts
> in kselftest. These are because it was the first RC and I ran the tests
> multiple times - first without a skipfile, and then again with a partial
> skipfile. All of the failures look like known issues that we also saw on
> 4.15 release.

Why does kselftest need a "skip list"? Shouldn't all of the tests that
ship in the kernel tree, pass on that release? Is anyone looking into
the failures? That seems like a pretty obvious thing :(

And was anyone testing the -rc releases to catch this before 4.15 came
out? If not, why not? I thought you all were testing rc releases
now...

Anyway, thanks for the reports.

thanks,

greg k-h