Re: [RFC] x86/retpoline: Add clang support for 64-bit builds

[David Woodhouse]

On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 12:32 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> 
> >Â
> Feedback, anyone ?
> 
> I understand that there is no love for the ABI differences between clang
> and gcc, but that doesn't help me. Even if the patch is unacceptable
> as-is, I would like to have some feedback to get an idea if I am on the
> right track, and what I would have to change to at least move into the
> right direction.

I'm going for just a comprehensive NACK. If they fix clang so that at
least the thunk symbols __x86_indirect_thunk_\reg are compatible, then
we could tolerate command line differences. Otherwise, just no.

Unless you really fancy trying to do some kind of alias hack in modules
so that they link to the external thunk by its proper name, even when
built with clang? I reserve the right to hate that too.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature