Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: Relax constraints on ID feature bits

[Suzuki K Poulose]

On 07/02/18 15:09, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 02:21:05PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:

...

> [...]
>
> > -	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR0_ASID_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We handle differing ASID widths by explicit checks to make sure the system is
> > +	 * safe via verify_cpu_asid_bits()
>
> I guess that's sufficient.
>
> Although I had suggested adding a comment to verify_cpu_asid_bits()
> cross-referencing back to here, it now seems superfluous.  It's fairly
> obvious what that function is supported to do.
>
>
> [...]
>
> > -	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR1_VHE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>
> [...]
>
> > +	/*
> > +	 * When CONFIG_ARM64_VHE is enabled, we ensure that there is no conflict in run
> > +	 * levels via verify_cpu_run_el()
> > +	 */
> > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR1_VHE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>
> Similarly ack.
>
>
> [...]
>
> > -	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR2_IESB_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>
> [...]
>
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Lacking implicit ESB on exception boundaries on a subset of CPUs is no worse than
> > +	 * lacking it on all of them.
> > +	 */
> > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR2_IESB_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>
> And again.  Thanks.
>
> [...]
>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>


Thanks Dave !