Re: [PATCH v2 05/20] arm64: capabilities: Add flags to handle the conflicts on late CPU

[Suzuki K Poulose]

On 07/02/18 11:31, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 07/02/18 10:38, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 06:27:52PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:

...

> > > Case (b) is not permitted for errata work arounds which requires some work
> > > around, which cannot be delayed. And we ignore (b) for features. Here, yet
> >
> > Nit, maybe:
> >
> > "Case (b) is not permitted for any errata workaround that cannot be
> > activated if the kernel has finished booting and has not already enabled
> > it."
>
> Nit^2: I think it would suffice to say "...that cannot be activated after the kernel has finished booting." - since we don't really have the concept of *de*activating workarounds, it is already implicit in that statement that the one in question wasn't activated *before* the kernel finished booting.

Robin, Dave,

I have updated the comments accordingly.

Thanks a lot for the review

Suzuki