Re: [RFC, PATCH v1] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Convert to pure ACPI driver

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday, February 7, 2018 2:18:52 PM CET Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 13:08 +0000, Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Pali Rohár [mailto:pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 3:55 AM
> > > To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>; Limonciello, Mario
> > > <Mario_Limonciello@xxxxxxxx>; andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > acelan.kao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH v1] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Convert to
> > > pure ACPI driver
> > > 
> > > On Wednesday 07 February 2018 10:47:57 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > BTW, please CC patches with ACPI material to linux-acpi.  They are
> > > > less likely
> > > > to be overlooked by me then and the others on that list may have
> > > > opinions on
> > > > them too.
> > > 
> > > Maybe we can update MAINTAINERS file for acpi based platform-x86
> > > drivers
> > > to include linux-acpi list? Darren, Andy, any idea?
> > > 
> > 
> > I would also wonder if the intel-vbtn driver should still live in
> > platform-x86 as it's
> > now pure ACPI driver with this change Andy proposed.
> > 
> > Btw Andy for your v2 with your fixups that were in your review branch
> > feel free
> > to add:
> > Tested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > When you resubmit it.
> 
> Mario, Rafael clarifies the matter and NACKed this one (which kinda was
> expected by me, that's why RFC was in the first place).
> 
> I'm going to drop this patch from my queue.

Thanks!